Cookies Always Burn On Bottom

We should not notice (which occur in childhood with us)

Alice Miller, the grande dame of the study of "poisonous pedagogy" has for decades it worked people to open their eyes to their childhood and their experiences of how influence early childhood experiences life and how our whole society has always been sick, and without that this would be noticed. Rather than take a stand for the child, were and are adults and the system is protected, the "education" instead of development and advancement of the child propagated.

Evil has always been frightening, yet alluring at the same time. Where did it come from? How did it originate? Many explanations have been found over the centuries for all culminated however, is that the evil part of human nature itself is. In Christianity, one knows that the "original sin". Even today, it seems that most agree agree that evil is not just inevitable, necessary to man, if not the entire universe belonged, and the best you can do what you learn to deal with it. To believe in an "elimination" or "resolution" of evil, most consider utopian, indeed for almost crazy. The old view that evil is inherent to human nature, has a fatal effect on the education of children, for humanity in general and even more on the health of all species. If evil can not be eliminated, then there is in truth no hope of a "good world", at least in this world. Then the projected hopes of a hereafter, where a higher power would then defeat the evil and "things right" would bring. This view assumes the people the hope and becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. If we continue to think so, then it may be a "good" or even better world never ever give - it would be a hopeless condition and who would waste his energy for that? It is hoped that this mistake will be viewed and shake future generations to deal only the head of the barbarity of their ancestors and their limited world view, which was woven of errors. Where to start these errors? In childhood! There, even evil has its origin. Alice Miller has it figured out long ago: The evil is not easy in the world and it is certainly not innate! It exists only because we shape our children against their nature to educate them (and I use the word "education" hate!) And so evil as a result type of oppression and confusion, from generation to generation! Evil exists only because it is grown in each new generation! And all largely unconscious, so that parents are seriously convinced that they only want "the best" for their children and do. Sun there is a completely false idea of \u200b\u200b"love". What is referred to in our society as such is pure manipulation, Dressage, corruption, "Have Love" no real "being love"!

The congregation of the education is that it is performed on an innocent being who is far too little, in order to resist and has not yet developed the confidence to know what happens to him. If the child is brought up again, say to become a "like" people, it does not remember anything and it looks as if this would correspond to his nature. But education is usually nothing else than the child for the world and the parents to make docile and adapted. Even today, the prevailing view that a child can not be out on its own well, you have to break his will. Of course it expresses no longer so drastically. In earlier times you did this is still open. But still one is satisfied that a child would need correction and that the will and the needs of adults stood in a higher rank than that of the child. All children and childhood are not highly valued in society. It is to be called for an insult than an adult "child" or "childish." For a child, but it is a praise when it is referred to as "adult" or "ripe". To be sure, the violence has now shifted from primarily physical layer to the emotional level. And the children suffer even more under it, as simply the human race. There has never been a society that valued the naturalness, the spontaneity really. Yes, it is the outright abandonment of any community, any social contract, this to suppress the individual and to shape it according to the general ideas. It's called "love" and his "civilized", "adapted" and not "authentic", "honest" and "oneself". If a mother says her child was "itself" or something "would correspond to its essence," they usually mean that the child now behaving as it has raised it as they see fit. Then there is a "good" child.

Alice Miller called the traditional education, the violence (in physical and mental form) applies and is still the dominant mode of education is "black pedagogy". The main aim of education is to pass on false information and to get a sick society upright. Eric Berne pointed out that education consists basically teach children what games (ie social vertigo) they should play in life. The child learns the roles to be played there, think how it is, what it should feel. This all leads to a confusion that persists throughout life. Such fatal chain from generation to generation can be broken only rarely, either by a fundamental event in the life (eg war, personal tragedy), or most often through therapy or, as the rarest Case, by an autonomous decision of the individual (this is only if the child, as it was autonomous yet, has even provided the opportunity for his later life). The true feelings of the child may not be expressed, or only in the frame, as the parents allow it. Every family has "wanted" and "undesirable" feelings and the child learns very early on an express and suppress the other, until this behavior seems quite natural and it imagine no other life can do more. Thus, there are families may be expressed in your joy, but no hate (hate is a normal and healthy human emotion, Hatred has never killed anyone and it should never be stopped, neither the child nor the adult). Very often, the family bid for the permits have sex, but love is forbidden.

The black education, is characterized by (A. Miller "In the beginning was education"):
1) Adults are the masters of the dependent children
2) You alone decide what is right and wrong
is 3) The child is held responsible for the anger of the adults
4) The parents must always be protected by means
5) The vitality of the child a danger to the autocratic adult
6) The will of the child's needs as early as can be broken.
7) All this must happen so early that the child can not remember and the adults can not identify as author.

false information given by the black education on are (from A. Miller "In the beginning was education"):
1) sense of duty produces love
2) hatred disappears when one forbids him
3) Parents deserve respect simply because they are parents
4) children deserve no respect because they are children
5) obedience makes children strong
6) High self-esteem is harmful
7) Low self-esteem makes an altruistic
8th ) tenderness is harmful
9th) to the needs of a child is wrong to take
10th) hardness and cold are good for preparation for life
11) Played gratitude is better than honest ingratitude
12) How do you behave yourself is important than how you really are
13) Neither the parents nor God would survive if they are attacked
14) The body is dirty and Ghastly
15) Strong feelings are harmful
16) parents are creatures that are free of shoots and guilt are
have 17) The parents are always right

The difficulties that afflict people in their lives, is to be found in childhood has long been nothing New. But this one has always protected the parents. The responsibility was with the child even more sought for his alleged "bad assets", the "wild nature" and the like. Alfred Adler represented yet the idea that neuroses and failures of all types declined the most for the "pampering" of the child. The pampering of children beyond measure, he saw it as fundamental evil. This love can be to a child never big enough, no one can get too much love and therefore become neurotic later, that is utter nonsense. What is wrong but is that short of what is called "Tenderness" is a subtle form of domination, Exercise of power and education can be put to dependence. But this is anything but love. Not the child's needs are important, but that of parents. The child's parents should be something rather than to receive something. Neuroses Speaking of mothers who themselves had to do without much in its infancy, is common. An incorrect type of nut can be seen as stifling mother or "mother hen" that their "chicks" can not be big and grown under their wings.

This article constitutes an initial step in the great theme of education, psychology, and their children, either that I am intense in the near future and will report back here on this page will report about it. Only this much: Whoever believes to have had a "good" childhood, so in all likelihood be subject to error. It is this issue should be closely scrutinized to spare without anyone. Man turns himself and his parents a disservice if you do so. But certainly their children will suffer if they do not want a serious examination of his own childhood.

Hospital Bed Restraints

The world view of Teilhard de Chardin - Statements - Part 6 / 6

The book "The Phenomenon of Man" was written more than seventy years ago and released only after the death of Teilhard de Chardin. Nevertheless, none of his world view lost its relevance. Although we now know much more about the world of "small particles", have made a wealth of prehistoric finds, the TDC were still unknown. But on the fundamental soundness of his views could not be shaken so far. We operate more people with ideas to help us navigate through the universe and our lives. The World View of TDC offers a wonderful setting by man can find his place within the entirety, of helping him to find his job in the world to give meaning and purpose not only the individual life but of all humanity is capable. And all without dogmatic beliefs that either must be fully accepted or rejected completely. TdC himself with this work contributed to science and religion, though still not reconciled with each other, they have yet to be done very close to each other. People agree it is easier to let both exist, as the one to give up for the other. I would just casually mention that the real reason why people with science or religion difficulty lies mostly in their own education. All too often, blind obedience is required, it is hardly a child who had a happy childhood. While most people are convinced that their beautiful childhood was, and her soul longs so to see it. But what psychologists know for some time, and gradually penetrates into the minds of a people: the child is actually the worst time of life when the child but is subject to trust themselves, to think and feel. The man is almost exclusively a result of training and part of that training is one's childhood to see as beautiful and to honor their parents. But the truth is the exact opposite! The world images that someone's linked directly with the education (what a terrible word in the background) together. This explains in part, as much aversion to the marriage of science and religion. Let we do not deceive us! The man takes out his position in life and that of his unconscious. The mind then has delivered only sent a statement to let the whole thing look justified. Most of the man himself believes it, "good reasons" for his attitude to have. And he also, it is not in a rational explanation, but in the love of the young child and its dependence on the parents who do not bring the truth to see, because it is so dear father and mother. That was only a small excursion into the realm of education and the corruption of childhood. I will begin in the coming days a new series on the subject.

The British scientist Rupert Sheldrake has already identified a few years ago, that there be a kind of "invisible network" has that same kind of living things to one another. He named this system "morphogenetic field". Seem to be, any information exchanged within the network between members of the same species who come in physical contact with one another never. A finch in New Zealand developed a new skill such as building a nest and shortly thereafter was the same skill in birds in Europe are studied, although the birds in New Zealand never had contact with their counterparts in Europe. There are many indications that it is sort of morphogenetic networks of people There. Our consciousness is likely to one another and could potentially every person with any other person without physical contact and technical resource record (video, Internet, phone, etc.) contact. How is the research here on, we'll see, but the approaches are promising.

As for the axis of evolution, then TdC they recognized in Jesus Christ. The tangential energy (charity) intensified the radial energy (love of God). So if the "way of Jesus" follows, which is consistent with the evolution of the universe. But for every man is that he must act in good faith and conscience. But the conscience can be very deceptive sein. Bei den meisten Menschen ist es so stumpf und von der Gesellschaft, den Eltern etc. so korrumpiert, dass es seine Funktion, als Kompass zu wirken, fast vollständig verloren hat. Erst, wenn der Mensch sich befreien kann, dann kann er wieder erkennen, wer er eigentlich ist und sein wahres Gewissen erkennen und dann danach handeln. Hier liegt meines Erachtens nach einer der kritischen Punkte: Das „Gewissen der Welt“ mit dem „wahren Gewissen“ zu verwechseln. Jesus sagt dazu: „Seid in der Welt, nicht von der Welt!“. Wer sein Leben in der Welt lebt, so als ob er von dieser Welt wäre und nicht von Gott, der wird seinem eigentlichen Auftrag nicht gerecht und führt auch kein völlig wertvolles Leben. I am absolutely convinced.

more thing I want to mention. Science has often been a distraction from the only what man really needs, namely himself, we studied the stars, made inventions of all kinds, have engineered the world, only ourselves, we are still a mystery. Progress may require the person only if he finds out who he really is himself, the fact we have to put the emphasis in the future. Otherwise we are like children, the sudden stop nuclear weapons in their hands. It is imperative that humanity "adult" is, or we will cease to exist sooner or later! The real struggle in the world is in the spirit instead. We have made a huge mistake, as we have separated God and man. So it was not originally intended. The real sin was to have not known God, but God created in his own mind and to have this picture in the "sky" is projected to have up and then held to be true to have. The separation between God and man has just created the dualism has a can occur above and below and thus good and evil. We must recognize that evil has its origin in suppressing the naturalness of the people and give erroneous assumptions from generation to generation. Evil is a mistake, not an entity in the universe! So ist der Weg des Menschen durch die Evolution ein einziger Passionsweg. Zwar ist diese Geburt immer mit „Geburtswehen“ verbunden und dem damit einhergehende Leid, doch gerade der Mensch hat den größten Teil seiner Schmerzen selbst verursacht, findet sogar Gefallen daran und ergötzt sich, vor allem, wenn der Schmerz den anderen und nicht einen selbst trifft, daran.

Eine letzte Bemerkung möchte ich noch machen. Das Internet ist ein Chaos, eine großer Misthaufen mit ein paar Perlen darin. Die Struktur ist überfrachtet von Informationen, von denen ein Großteil schädlich oder unsinnig ist. Doch gerade das Internet bietet einen schönen Einblick in die Geisteshaltung des heutigen Menschen. Die Hemmungen, die beim direkten persönlichen Kontakt gegeben sind, verschwinden im Internet in der scheinbaren Anonymität. So glaube ich, dass wir hier ein der Wahrheit eher entsprechendes Bild bekommen über das, was in den Köpfen wirklich vor sich geht, wenn keine „Höflichkeitsregeln“ eine Zensur vornehmen. Das sollte uns allen zu denken geben. Werden wir es erleben, dass im Internet eine Ordnung einkehrt, dass Menschen sich nicht mehr daran ergötzen andere nieder zu machen, zu verführen, zu manipulieren? Die Entwicklung wird es zeigen. Ich für meinen Teil habe aber trotz allem meinen leisen Optimismus anzumelden. Der Mensch ist im Grund viel besser, als er sich zeigt, er weiß es nur selbst nicht. Man hat ihm etwas Anderes beigebracht.

Tim Hortons Organizational Chart Diagram

The World View of Teilhard de Chardin - Higher Life - Part 5 / 6

Die Gefahr des modernen Menschen besteht darin, dass er auf den zunehmenden inneren psychischen Druck, der auf ihm lastet mit Isolation reagiert. Dies ist zwar verständlich, bedeutet aber eine Rückwendung, ein Regression. Tatsächlich ist das die häufigste Reaktion, die wir auf der Welt beobachten können. Die Welle der „Selbstverwirklichung“ ist immer noch nicht völlig abgeebbt und hat gerade in letzter Zeit noch einmal einen Aufschwung erlebt. Aber die wahre Selbstverwirklichung liegt, wie ich bereits im letzten Beitrag angesprochen habe gerade nicht darin sich zu isolieren und sich ausschließlich auf sich selbst zu zentrieren, sondern in the expansion of the tangential energy, that is, the tighter connection with the world and other people.

on the narcissism of the individual, often followed by the narcissism of a group. The nationalist and racist ambitions of the last two hundred years shows this clearly. It is the least individualistic of people who find themselves in the group most easily again. But in today's world, we need more identification, one with the whole world, and still more with the whole space. As long as man identifies himself with things that are limited, no matter how far the horizon may be as long as he will feel "small". If I and the whole World would be, I would be still tiny compared to the universe. The only way to safety, final security to obtain, is to identify with the universe as a whole, with the infinity of space and time. Previously known only to mystics, what that really means. But I am convinced that this, previously rare, experiences are individual, in the future to a general experience of the people will be absolutely, yes, must!

In the phase of noogenesis is about a "true spirit of the earth" to create the overall result of the individual centers of consciousness, we see the human spirit. The evolution is the rise of consciousness and the rise it des Bewusstseins ist die Einigungswirkung. Es kommt zu einer Meta-Synthese des Bewusstseins, woraus eine neue Schicht oberhalb der Sphäre des Denkens entsteht. Was es dazu braucht ist ein neues Leitbild, ein erweitertes Bild des Humanismus. Viel wird heute darüber gesprochen zwischen dem Gegensatz von einem humanistischen und einem gotteszentristischen Weltbild. Beide sind im Grunde kein Widerspruch. Gott und Mensch sind nicht voneinander zu trennen. Dieser Irrtum ergibt sich nur dort, wo es heißt man müsse sich entscheiden, ob nun Gott oder der Mensch im Zentrum des Weltbildes stünde. Gott steht zwar außerhalb der Schöpfung, durchdringt sie aber gleichermaßen von Anfang an in jedem noch so kleinen Teilchen. Ein wahres Gotteszentriertes Weltbild is a human-centered world view and a true humanist worldview is one in which God is in the center. Only when we understand and resolve the dichotomy, then we shall be able to struggle through a new unified world view. So far we have not reached that far.

Today, man can grow only by mutual penetration further. use by the acceptance of many works by machines, their minds were more people in the real spiritual realm and this gradually led to a new "awareness" at a higher level. All really great progresses slowly and is barely noticed in its early days. In the noogenesis be the space and the time human. The universal and the personal are not mutually exclusive anymore, they both strive towards a common climax. The universal future can only be a supra-personal - the Omega Point. Omega has already into everything.

The universe is a collector and preserver "of consciousness. The collective of the people is gradually a "world soul" to form. Selfishness is the confusion of individuality with personality. The egoist feels true, but it is subject to error. In order to really be ourselves, we must move forward in the sense of convergence with everything else. Our ultimate being, our Uniqueness lies not in their individuality, but in our person. The true ego grows in inverse proportion to selfishness! Grows all by itself, the universal energy of love.

love full biological reality is the attraction exerted by a being to other beings. It is therefore just the love that creates the future "world soul". Universal love is psychologically quite possible and it is the complete and definitive nature of the capacity for love. A collective, the individual absorbs kills, love, and ultimately resists evolution. What are the attributes of this endpoint, the Omega point, from which was already written so much? 1) Love (universal and unconditional!) God is love, according to the Bible, just as it is the love that accompanies the evolution from the beginning and it has driven and will be their great end. 2) The survival and 3) reversibility. Omega is the last member of a series but it is even outside of evolution.

One finding is important: on the state of the animals, the radial energy is at death returns to the tangential, in humans, however, the radial free from tangential! This is precisely the uniqueness of man. When a body dies, he lives on still, life after death is not an illusion, but reality! At some point the science probably be able to recognize this, until then there are some indications that do not, however, for a scientific "truth." And so we'll have to think for a while because we will live on after death.

The end of the world is unimaginable. Usually one connects to a kind of huge catastrophe, a hellish apocalypse. The higher the noogenesis, the more dangerous is also the action of man: wars, epidemics, natural disasters, etc. rather than take off. The end of the individual being out but not the end of the kind that is unfortunately all too often forgotten. But to humanity as a whole is now the whole evolution. Without us, there is no Development, we stand or fall with everything. Nature can not exist without us. We ourselves have become the pace of nature, we have become identical with it, and even more: the whole universe depends on us! We fail, it fails the whole creation! But between the infinitely small and infinitely large there seems to be an agreement, the consciousness that developed between them to support and protect. God's hand saved before the creation of sinking, and that is our biggest trump card we have! And it justifies the optimism, belief in the future and more so the faith of the people to the people themselves

There are three Main lines along which the humanized Evolution (the fake) is moving. 1) The science, 2) focus on the object person, and 3) connection between science and religion. Of these three points will determine how developed the noogenesis. We look to the outside, but also to recognize women and that the most interesting object of study of the man himself. When science goes beyond the stage of analysis and also the synthesis of turns and is connected to religion, then we can get into a unified, real act of knowledge, an association of mysticism and science! To include the human person, then the universe irreversible personality . Emerge

For the end there are now two scenarios. Either converges the world in peace, the war is finally disposed of, poverty and crime will disappear gradually from the ground. The second scenario would be a division of the world. While one part is more developed in the context of noogenesis, makes progress on Omega, is another part of war, terror and chaos and put Omega never reached. The advanced part would then "go to heaven" at the end, while "go to hell" part of the arrears would. This scenario is more the classic notions of the end times. What will happen is, it is not a bad decision to align his life on Omega. Maybe we will meet then all of a day in "heaven" again! I think the thing is worth it!